"steve" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:09:58 +0100, Nimrod wrote:

Personally, if it turns out that he was involved in terrorist activities,
I'd support executing his immediate family and friends too - they either
knew what the **** was up to or they had their heads in the sand and
these
days that is just as dangerous. We should escalate the cost of becoming a
terrorist to such a degree that the bomber risks all his or her family
and
friends, not just their own life. Certainly the people around these
****ers would then take more notice and do something to stop them. And
yes, I know most of you liberal human rights ******s will call me a
fascist or some other crap but I don't give a ****. I've got the right to
hold this opinion as much as you have to hold the opposite and neither of
us are going to change our minds so don't bother arguing with me because
I
ain't listening.


No need for human rights arguments just common sense and a small
degree of knowledge. Do you honestly think you ill thought out idea
would reduce bombing. FFS they happily kill other Muslims in their
bombings, how do they get round this - well they also become martyrs if
they are good Muslims, otherwise they are infidels. Of course, only the
foot soldiers believe this and the generals do not give a ****.

In the light of this, perhaps you want to reconsider.


not at all. They're happy to kill the faceless people of their own religion,
but having their family and friends pay the price for their madness might
make some of them reconsider. It will also make their family and friends
much more likely to either stop him or turn him in to the authorities if
they have to pay as well.