On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:50:36 +0100, Ian F. wrote in
, seen in uk.railway:
"Ross" wrote in message
...

No you don't, any more than you *have* to use Woolworths,

What a fatuous analogy! There are dozens of shops that sell the same items
as Woolworths.

I assume that by "fatuous analogy" you mean "Oh, ****, he doesn't
agree with me and I can't come up with a decent argument"?

In case you haven't noticed, there are far more methods of transport
than just trains. Of course, if you wish to only consider one method
(be that train, bus, car or elephant), that's up to you.


And yet they don't seem to have any problems making a profit

I think you'll find they do!
rest of post snipped due to lack of credibility

Yup, I was right. You can't come up with a decent argument so you try
to claim my point isn't credible.

Still, the fact that you are unable to defend your own assertions says
everything I need to know about the value of your own position.


It's very noticeable that throughout this thread there are plenty of
people posting about how awful transport staff are and how the
business is a monopoly, but only who is actually willing to justify
his statements - and he's not one of the people who's claiming poor
staff. All the rest either go quiet or start stonewalling when their
views are challenged.

Strange that. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact they know
they're talking ********?

--
Ross, Lincoln, UK

We're *not* afraid
http://www.werenotafraid.com