Thread: Oyster on NR
View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
Old September 9th 05, 03:06 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Mizter T Mizter T is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Oyster on NR

Jason wrote:
On 25 Aug 2005 08:15:43 -0700, "Mizter T" wrote:
I've overheard someone else being caught doing it by RP staff when changing
Tube lines at Zone 1 interchange stations ("I though my ticket included
Zone 1" - "No sir it doesn't" etc etc).


Some years ago, I used to travel from the northern end of the Victoria
line to West London, changing to the Piccadilly at Green Park.

There were numerous times when ticket checks were done in the
interchange tunnels, precisely for this reason.


Those aren't the type of journeys that I regularly make during rush
hour (when I guess the RPIs are more likely to be at such locations),
so it's interesting to hear you're experience that such interchanges
are regularly targetted.

Something I'm not sure I've ever seen is a ticket inspection on board a
Tube train though. This leaves open the option for people to travel
though zones on a single Tube train using a paper Travelcard which
doesn't have the correct zonal validity. Examples could include Bethnal
Green to White City with no changes on the Central Line, or Kennington
to Camden Town on the Northern Line.

Because of this and other notions about 'Big Brother watching over us'
some people may wish to avoid Oyster. I supsect that some NR stations
that are near Tube stations may see a slight rise in the number of
7DTC's sold, but no subsequent increase in passenger traffic.


Additionally, people with paper travelcards can't have journey start
and end times verified for LU "Customer Charter" claims - another
reason for some to avoid Oyster.


How very true. That's not something I'd considered.

Years ago, I had a friend who funded all his Tube travelling by
claiming for non-existant delays. His justification, which we all took
issue with at the time, was some vague youthful notion of 'subverting
the system' or some such. His 'subversion' obviously had the convenient
effect of saving him cash! Some years later, after he'd matured
somewhat, when confronted with his past actions he acknowledged he'd
been very much in the wrong.

It still occasionally leads me to wonder how many others out there
might have the brass balls required to be pulling the same stunt at the
moment.