View Single Post
  #95   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 05, 12:45 AM posted to uk.transport.london
James Farrar James Farrar is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2005
Posts: 905
Default New fares from 2 January 2006 - pdf

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:23 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
(Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:

In article ,
(James Farrar) wrote:

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:44:17 +0000, Paul Terry
wrote:

In message , Clive
writes

If you can beat Oyster fares then why are you whinging?

I think Colin's point, with which I agree, is that there are a
number of types of journey that are more expensive using Oyster.

However, whenever anyone mentions this, we seem to be dubbed "the
anti-Oyster brigade" by people whose knowledge of travel patterns
other than their own seems somewhat limited.


They get accused of being anti-Oyster when they complain about a
"rip-off" that is, in fact, not charging more to anyone but the
paranoid and the lazy.


Er, charging twice as much for cash as on Oyster isn't a rip-off? What
is this world you inhabit?


A world when choosing to pay more is not being ripped off.

For single journeys, use Oyster or pay for the privilege of using a
paper ticket.

--
James Farrar
. @gmail.com