wrote in message
...
asdf said:

David's whole chain of reasoning seems to be based on:

a) TfL's tram scheme is flawed.
b) His trolleybus scheme isn't TfL's tram scheme.
c) Therefore, his trolleybus scheme can't be flawed.

He then spends all his arguing points (a) and (b), even though we all
agree with him about those. But, he does nothing at all to convince us
about point (c), which is the part that's bothering us.

I thought David's chain of reasoning was

a) I like trolleybuses
b) Therefore everyone else should pay for one on every street

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes