Roland Perry said:

The *reason* for the second outage might have been human error
[1], but the second outage was most definitely *caused* (ie
triggered) by the first. It wasn't an "unrelated" incident.

[1] Although you could argue that it was really caused by failure
to implement a procedure that would have noticed and rectified
that human error.

So much for redundancy as a method of protection. Doesn't anybody
test these things?

--
=============================================

Chris Game chrisgame@!yahoo!dotcodotuk
=============================================