Rick Hughes wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in
:

However, the fact remains that a 17 year old has sufficient knowledge
to know that if a human body puts itself in the path of a train
travelling at 100mph there is only one outcome. Why have compassion
for someone so reckless with his own well being? Try answering the
question, if only for those who don't have 17 year old children.

I doubt that there's anyone reading this who's never done anything
dangerous at some time or other. Most of us take minor risks every
day of our lives, including you, if you care to think about it. If
you fall off the ladder whilst trying to put the fairy on top of the
Christmas tree, too bad, you should have had sufficient knowledge to
avoid putting yourself in such obvious danger?

It may be foolish to trespass on a railway line, but doing so doesn't
mean certain death, however much some people here imagine it does.
This youth died because he was on a railway line, and presumably
misjudged his situation and the danger. Literally thousands of other
trespassers on that day, as every day, walked across or along railway
lines, then continued about their business unharmed and unconcerned.
Millions of other people crossed roads without injury, but a small
proportion of them also misjudged, and didn't make it safely. Did
these also get what they deserved?

Who said he deserved to die? Who said that simply being on or about a
railway line meant certain death? He didn't die because he was on a railway
line. He died because he was stupid enough to get hit by a fast moving
train.

Trains Don't Take Prisoners!