View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 10th 06, 04:00 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Bob Bob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2005
Posts: 114
Default East London Line Rolling Stock Proposals


The Independent archives its material within a short period. I annex
therefore an extensive quotation for the benefit of later discussion.
Quote
East London Line's £100m bids
By Tim Webb The Independent
Published: 08 January 2006
Four companies have each submitted £100m bids to supply trains for the
£900m East London Line Tube extension. Manufacturers Siemens,
Bombardier and Hitachi are offering to build new trains, which would be
a cross between those used on the Underground and those operating on
the rail network. The fourth bidder, the train-leasing company
Portabrook, would supply pre-owned trains.
Transport for London will select the winning bidder at the end of next
month.
The East London Line is being extended in the north to Dalston and in
the south to West Croydon and Crystal Palace in the first phase of
expansion, scheduled to be completed in 2010. It is the largest
transport infrastructure project in the London Mayor's five-year plan.
Four consortia are already bidding for the main contract, worth around
£500m, to build new bridges and stations and lay new track. Those bids
are being led by Laing O'Rourke, Mowlem, Balfour Beatty and Skanska.
The construction consortia, which have already been through a
pre-qualification process, will submit their offers at the end of
March.
The second phase of the expansion will see the East London Line extend
across south London to Peckham Rye and terminate at Clapham Junction,
mostly using existing track.
This had been slated to be completed by 2012. But the timetable is
likely to slip as other infrastructure projects, which will more
directly benefit the Olympic Games, take priority to be completed in
time for 2012.
Transport for London will receive a £400m low-interest loan from the
European Investment Bank because the work will benefit deprived areas
of inner London. Funding has not yet been secured for the second phase
of the expansion.
Unquote

I also annex the original RFP published in respect of this stock.

Quote
EAST LONDON LINE ROLLING STOCK PREQUALIFICATION
3.2 Rolling Stock Requirements
3.2.1 The initial rolling stock requirement is for a minimum of 18
trains for service
with sufficient spare trains to accommodate fleet maintenance and
ensure fleet
availability. The trains will be Electric Multiple Units ('Units')
with each Unit
being no more than 83 metres long over coupler faces. The Units are to
be
capable of operation on the Extended East London Line and associated
main
line routes. Additional Units may be required to accommodate further
expansion of operations.
3.2.2 The proposed service plan is for a minimum of 18 trains in
service for
approximately 19 hours a day, 7 days a week. The service pattern will
be
constant from start-up to closure (i.e. there will be no peak and
off-peak service
pattern).
3.2.3 From the initial timetabling, the predicted annual passenger
mileage per Unit is approximately 100,000 miles (160,000km).
3.2.4 The Units are intended for use on inner suburban metro type
services with
typical distances between stations on the core route being less than
1km. The
performance characteristics of the Units must be suitable for this type
of
operation with high acceleration performance levels between 0.8m/s²
and
1.0m/s² up to the maximum core route line speed of 40mph.
3.2.5 A fully rated friction braking system will be required such that
a Unit may
operate normally with the dynamic brake isolated. Blended regenerative
and
fully rated rheostatic braking systems are also required. However,
these
systems must each be capable of isolation by maintenance staff. To
reflect the
metro type service, the braking system must have a high performance to
optimise the operational performance of the Units.
3.2.6 The Units must be designed for a maximum speed of not less than
75mph in order to maximize flexibility in operation.
3.2.7 The interior layout of the Units should maximize passenger
capacity and
facilitate the efficient access and egress of passengers in order to
minimize
station dwell times. A fully loaded Unit with fully occupied seats and
standing
passengers at 5.5 passengers/m² should have a minimum capacity of 750
passengers.
3.2.8 Toilets are not required.
3.2.9 The Units shall be supplied with driver's cabs fitted with
independent Heating,
Ventilation and Air Conditioning ('HVAC') units.
3.2.10 The passenger compartment should have, as a minimum, a forced
pressure ventilation system. If only a forced pressure ventilation
system is proposed it should be possible to upgrade it to air-cooling
or full air conditioning.
3.2.11 The supplied Units must meet the requirements of BS6853 and
comply with at least Category 1b fire rating.
3.2.12 The Units must be capable of being Driver-Only-Operated
('DOO') and fitted with the necessary onboard equipment to monitor
passengers' access and
egress.
3.2.13 The Units must represent a low technical and commercial risk.
Therefore the use of proven systems, designs and configurations is
preferred.
3.2.14 The Units will operate in narrow single bore tunnels. For
emergency egress each Unit must include end access doors and emergency
egress steps/ramps at each end. The end access doors should allow for
Unit-to-Unit evacuation as well as Unit-to-track evacuation. The
vehicles shall be semi-permanently coupled, preferably with wide
through gangways within the Unit.
3.2.15 Potential design options may include number and layout of seats,
fittings and equipment. An ability to accommodate design options as
late as possible is
preferred, in order to reflect the requirements of the appointed
operator.
3.2.16 The Units must be capable of operation on the national rail
third rail
electrification system. An ability to be readily converted to 25 kV AC
overhead
operation is desirable.
3.2.17 The Rolling Stock Supplier will be responsible for all
activities required to
enable the passenger service operator to obtain a Route Acceptance
Safety
Case and any other approvals required to allow the Units to operate.
3.2.18 The supply, operation and maintenance of the Units will be
required to comply with Railway Group Standards, ATOC Standards, HMRI
requirements and guidance and other standards and requirements as more
specifically detailed in the Invitation to Tender and detailed
specification (see section 10 below for further information).
3.2.19 The Units will operate through Network Rail and LU operated
stations. The Rolling Stock Supplier will be required to take due
cognizance of pertinent LU Standards and other special requirements
that may apply at these stations.
3.2.20 The supplied Units are required to interface efficiently with
the upgraded
infrastructure and installations. The Rolling Stock Supplier will be
required to
co-operate with the infrastructure contractors and the Contracting
Authority to
ensure an efficient and effective interface.
3.2.21 The integration and delivery of the rolling stock is programmed
over an
approximate thirty-six month period. Test running of the rolling stock
on the
upgraded East London Line infrastructure is anticipated to commence in
early
2009. See section 8 below for further information.
3.2.22 The provision of a driver cab simulator unit as part of a
developed driver training programme is also anticipated to form part of
the Rolling Stock Supply
Contract.
3.2.23 The Units must be fully compliant with the Rail Vehicle
Accessibility Regulations (RVAR) 1999 and the Disability Discrimination
Act (DDA) 1995.

The quote required 5.5 passengers per square metre both standing or
sitting. How does this compare with the LUL A stock currently in use?

The quote also requested a capability to be easily converted to 25kv AC
- I assume that is an " as well as" 750v DC.

With a production run of only 20 trains (18 in service 2 on overhaul)
(BWOR CSC use 72 trains with maintenance cover of 2)- this has got to
be an out of the catalogue buy as bespoke trains would just be too
expensive - so it looks like £5 million pound per train.
These penny numbers train orders cannot be economic.