"Cast_Iron" wrote the following in:
"Robin May" wrote in message
...
(Mait001) wrote the following in:
I reserve personal attack for special people.
In other words, when you have lost the argument, you resort to
abuse. That's fine, just don't expect your views to hold much
weight or your services as an advocate to be much employed.
It seems that you're the one who resorts to abuse. Don't like
someone's views? Brand them mentally ill. Nice tactic.
Who do you believe accused who of being mentally ill?.
I had believed Mait001 accused protesters of being mentally ill, but it
seems I was mistaken. There was an accusation of mental illness in this
thread but it was not made by Mait001 and was against the protestor at
Parliament Square, although he did express 'total agreement' with it.
That said, labeling someone as in some way deviant (e.g. drug addict,
mentally ill, criminal etc.) is a classic way of attacking and
attempting to invalidate someone's views without actually providing a
valid argument against them.
--
message by Robin May, consumer of liquids
If bathroom means toilet in America, I'll have a shower please.
Hacker is to computer as boy racer is to Ford Escort.