Thread: Mill Hill East
View Single Post
  #74   Report Post  
Old April 8th 06, 10:59 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Steve Fitzgerald Steve Fitzgerald is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 627
Default Mill Hill East

The other flaw in the main arguments are a "through service", a
"through service" to what exactly? Camden? Change. Bank? Change.
Euston? Change.


The current through service is to Morden or Kennington.

The notion of reducing train lengths incidentally to save costs is
ridiculous in this instance because there would have to be customised
rolling stock for a branch line.


No, there wouldn't. The Northern Line trains are 3-car units, coupled
in pairs to make 6-car trains. You could run a single unit as the
shuttle.


Except the trains are formed with UNDMs at the inner ends of the units
and therefore have no driving cabs (Apart from the shunting panel, of
course). 95 stock doesn't have any double ended 3 car units.
--
Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building.
You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK
(please use the reply to address for email)