"MartyJ" wrote in message
ups.com...
The sooner the whole West London Tram scheme is abandoned the better,
it has a huge level of public hostility along with the Councils being
opposed the scheme. Far better to progress Croydon Tramlink extension
schemes in South London(where public hostility is very little) and
Cross River Tram. The scheme will die or death sooner or later, why
don't TfL just pull the plug on the whole thing now and spend the money
on more worthwhile schemes?

Martin
Dave Arquati wrote:
Bob wrote:
If the majority of the residents of West London want to sit in traffic
jams - they have the democratic right to do so. It has always struck
me
as odd that the West London scheme should be second on the list after
Croydon. Wouldn't the Cross River Link have a bigger economic impact?

I think the Mayor is keen to avoid accusations of being a Mayor for
central London only - hence the progression of the East London and
Greenwich Waterfront Transit schemes, and WLT.

Additionally, the CRT scheme is partly dependent on the ins and outs of
the regeneration schemes at King's Cross and Elephant & Castle. The
latter in particular will create a route for CRT through the road
junctions which doesn't currently exist; to construct CRT before the E&C
regeneration scheme would either mean a delay to the start of Peckham
branch services (thus also limiting frequency through the core section)
or would mean ripping up the tram tracks just a year or two after
putting them down (and indeed rebuilding the road junction twice).

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London


I live and work not too far away from the West London Tram area.
What is proposed has already been done. The bus route 207 is the tram route.
And the 207 is currently a fleet of bendies which do as bendies do and block
up
junctions and cause congestion when driven badly or without consideration.
The 207 has it's own bus lane for most of the section where the WLT will go.
And there are lots of 207's.

So I really see not a lot of difference to what we already have.
I can see why Tfl may want to do this solely as a replacement for the
existing 207.

The area is as people have already said a very busy area which econmically
is doing very well.
The 207 are jammed full most of the day.