View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 24th 06, 02:52 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Mizter T Mizter T is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Infraco's criticised again in 3rd annual PPP report

R.C. Payne wrote:

Mizter T wrote:
Like the sub-surface Underground lines, my unneccesary apostrophe
filter appears to be suffering from poor performance because of the
heat. I shall take the advice of the Tube station posters and drink
some water before I continue my journey on usenet.


It could be argued that words endin in -co as an abreviation for company
could legitmately be made plural by co's as a contraction of companies.
Of course if you were doing that, you should probably write it infra'co's.

Robin


I did consider that as my defence but as you say logic would suggest
the inclusion of two apostrophes, so I decided not to as I would've
been caught out by the sharp eyed readers here on utl!

IMO it would of course be better if we didn't have to write about
infracos/infra'co's whatsoever, but the Treasury decided that PPP was
the way to go so here we are, wondering at the joys of the infracos'
incompetence (that is, the incompetence of the infracos!).