View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 1st 03, 05:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Cast_Iron Cast_Iron is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 313
Default Any dvd's out about the london underground?

simon wrote:
In message , Cast_Iron
writes
Nick Cooper 625 wrote:
Martin wrote in message
...

There appear to be a few available in NTSC format at
http://www.eavb.co.uk/video/ybindex.html
This is a good site -
http://www.transportdiversions.com/
but I dont know
quite what's available in NTSC. Could also have a look
at
the Ian Allan
online store at
http://www.ianallansuperstore.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi but I
suspect their range will be similar. Mind you, if you've
got a multizone DVD
player, a modern TV should be able to play both PAL and
NTSC disks - at least
that's how it seems to work here in NZ.

The same applies here, but only because Region 2 includes
counrtries
using both 625-line PAL (e.g. UK, most of Europe, South
Africa) and 525-line NTSC (Japan). Similarly, Region 4
includes NZ & Australia on 625-line PAL , but also Central
& South America, some of the countries
in which use 525-line NTSC or similar varients (e.g.
Brazil
with it's
bizarre 525-line PAL-M). Regions 3 & 5 include similar
mixes, but
Region 1, covering the US & Canada, is NTSC only.

It is possible to buy multi-standard DVD players, VCRs and
TV sets in
the US, but they are very much in the specialist sphere,
and come at a
price premium. Consumers outside of the Region 1 area are
usually a
lot more savvy when in comes to the differences in TV
standards, but
those within - and especially those in the United States -
are pretty
clueless. That not meant as a insult, simply that most
yanks seem
genuinely surpirsed to discover that there is a
difference!


What else do you expect of a country that has "world
championships" for a sport that no-one else plays?



I presume you are referring to the World Series which was
actually sponsored by (I believe) The World newspaper in
New York.

Simon from England.
(Just in case you assumed I was a Yank)


Thank you for the clarification but the "you" in my earlier post was of the
general type rather than the personal.