Bob wrote:
Outside London bus companies have a direct incentive to collect fares
because they are taking the revenue risk. In London TfL takes the
revenue risk but fares used to be collected by the franchised bus
companies.Did they just turn over the cash to TfL at the end of the
day? How did TfL check that all the fares that should be paid were
paid?

I suppose it's just about being honest, how do non-London Local
Authorities know that drivers aren't just pressing the "Conc" button on
their ticket machine every 5 mins to record a non-existant concessionary
journey so the company can get more money?

TfL can surely check from ticket machine records, but what if tickets
aren't being issued? I think something dodgy is happenning in Bristol -
I've caught a few council subsidised routes lately where drivers aren't
recording pass usage and are allowing some people to travel for free,
and charging others a token amount and not issuing tickets.

Does the move to Oyster Cards now mean that the cash now flows
straight from the consumer to TfL?

I suppose so, although drivers are still taking fares for people without
tickets or Oyster outside Central London anyway.

In which case how does it check that
all passengers who should have checled through using their Oyster Cards
have done so? Does anybody keep a check on the number of young people
and pensioners using their concessionary travel?

It's not really relevent, the LA's are paying TfL money to administer
the Freedom Pass scheme, and TfL don't need to reimburse the bus
operators - the free travel for under 16s/under 18s in education is
TfL-funded anyway and doesn't need checking up on.
--
The presence of this signature shows that this message has been scanned
for misplaced apostrophes by the common sense scanner. However, some
apostrophes may not be included where required due to boredom, gross
negligence, budget cuts, incompetence, stupidity or just plain laziness.
http://www.railwaysonline.co.uk