Thread: Camera cost
View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 20th 06, 03:21 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
Adrian Adrian is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Default Camera cost

) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

allan tracy wrote:
That's what everyone who hates the cameras (speed or otherwise)
conveniently forgets, that there seems to be an endless supply of
f**kwits out there.


And the ****wits don't have to worry about the cameras, because they're
driving a stolen car, or have fake plates or haven't bothered to
register it.

We used to have this system where the ****wits were penalised while the
reasonable drivers could break stupid laws when doing so wasn't overly
dangerous; you see, we had people in cars driving around the roads to
stop those who behaved dangerously and punish them. Unfortunately that
was expensive, whereas setting up cameras which penalise the reasonable
drivers while doing nothing to affect ****wits brings in money, so road
safety was thrown out the window in the search for easy cash.

And now ****wits like you defend the scam that's done more to reduce
road safety and destroy respect for the police than anything I can
think of.


Applause

All Allan needs to do is to look at how little the road casualty figures
have gone down over the course of a decade during which the primary safety
- crash survivability - of cars has rocketed.

Changing nothing else would have seen casualty figures falling drastically,
ergo the stasis must be due to a negative effect from the other changes.