C wrote:
"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message
...
Richard J. wrote in message
:

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground
station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures
(for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special
year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-)


PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title -
can't believe I didn't spot that till now!


So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley?

[sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last set of
official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005, Terminal 4 was
listed as having NO passengers (which you would have realised if you had
followed the links I provided) because it was closed all year while the
junction to the new Terminal 5 station was constructed. (Actually I
think it operated for the first week of January 2005, but that doesn't
seem to have registered in the stats.)

Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station stats for
2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney Valley) currently has
the fewest passengers.

You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in this
group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but misleading
answers!

Happy New Year.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)