On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 00:58 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), Colin Rosenstiel
wrote:

but perhaps the reason for King's court not sticking is
that it's a bloody stupid name for a sponsor, being so generic and
commonplace. Wouldn't William IV court have been more likely to
last?

Since they were just starting a 63-year Queen's reign that might not have
been seen in that light?

Do you think it's likely their decision was influenced by the fact
that a Queen was about to reign for 63 years?