View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 02:46 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Boltar Boltar is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District?

"Cast_Iron" wrote in message ...
Tube stock and surface stock are approximately the same width, it is only


Not true , surface stock is a foot wider which amounts to a lot more extra
room inside the carriages.

Of course situations change and hindsight is a wonderful thing. I am however


You don't need hindsight to know that bigger trains = better carrying
capacity.

quite sure that if it had been decided to build the Heathrow extension to
surface stock loading gauge the whingers would have been complaining about
the additional expenditure and little use.


Even if the picc continued running the main service to the airport some
distruct trains could have used it occasionally to take up the slack, the
same way that the picc and met run togather to uxbridge.

B2003