View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 10:09 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Clive D. W. Feather Clive D. W. Feather is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District?

In article , Boltar
writes
Tube stock and surface stock are approximately the same width, it is only

Not true , surface stock is a foot wider which amounts to a lot more extra
room inside the carriages.


They are approximately the same width. Note that both tube and D stock
have 2+2 seating.

A stock is 3+2, but A stock is far too wide for most lines.

You don't need hindsight to know that bigger trains = better carrying
capacity.


No, since it's not necessarily true.

--
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address