On 15 Feb, 19:12, Paul Corfield wrote:
On 14 Feb 2007 17:09:50 -0800, "Mizter T" wrote:



On 14 Feb, 18:27, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:56:50 +0000, Paul Terry

wrote:
In message , Tom
Anderson writes

(snip)

Secondly, am i right in assuming the "planned" was a mistake?

Sounds like it: engineering work, yes, but not planned!

Planned in the sense that LU allowed them on to the tracks but not
planned in the sense of a long planned possession.
Are you sure you're not practising for an appearance before the
Assembly's transport committee Paul?!

Not that I'm aware of. Thankfully Mr O'Toole usually gets that job.
--
Paul C


Always good to have the right O'Toole for the job.