View Single Post
  #33   Report Post  
Old October 21st 03, 01:27 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Rob Rob is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 38
Default Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District?


"Johnny Mo" wrote in message
om...
(Boltar) wrote in message

om...
Something I was wondering the other day , when the extension to Heathrow
airport was built why didn't they re-extend the district line to

Hounslow
and beyond and divert the piccadilly to ealing? Why? Because district

trains
are much bigger and so they would have been much more room for

passengers
and their luggage rather than the pokey little tube trains on the picc.

Was there a good reason for not doing this given the benefits it would

have
entailed for passengers with luggage?

B2003


No one has yet noted there are legal differences between sub-surface
stock ( district line) and tube stock (picc). To put a district train
thru a single bore tunnel would require a whole new fleet. Tube (and
WAGN class 313) need lengthwise evacuation, sub-surface stock does
not.
Johnny Mo


I think the op meant when the track and tunnels were made, why not make them
bigger and send the bigger surface stock to the airport. IIRC 313's have
doors on the front of the cab. All underground stocks have steps or ramps to
help detrain onto track level.