View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Old March 20th 07, 11:34 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Clive D. W. Feather Clive D. W. Feather is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default Another W&C Closure?

In article , David of Broadway
writes
Yes, that occurred to me after posting. But do Piccadilly line trains
really have to use the side tracks? I realize that doing so can reduce
delays for eastbound passengers getting off at Acton Town, but it
doesn't actually speed up train service much, does it? One train still
has to wait for the other before leaving the station.


Actually, it can help because of the longer headways needed at stations.
Put simply, when you work out the numbers you find that the minimum
possible time between trains is longer at stations than between them.
With two platforms you can negate this to some extent because one train
can be running in to the station with the previous one still departing;
with one platform, you can't let the second train in until the first has
cleared the overlap.

Admittedly, in this case you then run into the bottleneck again at
Hammersmith, but having the lower headways at Acton gives you more
robustness.

It also helps with the District. Suppose that an eastbound train from
Heathrow is in the Piccadilly platform, with a District train from
Ealing Broadway behind a Piccadilly from Uxbridge. If the latter can get
into the station before the ex-Heathrow has left, even though it blocks
the District's platform, the latter still gets through earlier.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: