On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, keithy wrote:

On Apr 20, 3:42 pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, John Rowland wrote:
MaxB wrote:

...or as the programme was arguing (I think) to run more and longer
trains (particularly with more coaches at the front where it is most
crowded) ):

How is adding coaches at the front different to adding them at the back
or the middle?

Because the front is where it's crowded! DON'T YOU GET IT JOHN?!?

Actually dont you get it BARRY, What would happen if you put
additional carriges at the front?

Keithy, i was kidding. I realise that putting coaches on the front or the
back is exactly the same thing. In fact, i think it's bleeding obvious,
which is why Max's joke was so funny. I think John took it a touch too
seriously, hence my post.

tom

--
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
stupidity -- Hanlon's Razor