View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Old June 28th 07, 07:31 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Kev Kev is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2005
Posts: 221
Default I pay for this ?

On Jun 27, 3:48 pm, chunky munky
wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:43 pm, Kev wrote:





On Jun 27, 11:18 am, John B wrote: On Jun 27, 10:07 am, Kev wrote:


So why are there signal failures on the less than 10 years old Jubilee
Line extenstion or the less than 30 year old Jubilee Line or the less
than 50 years old Victoria Line. I thought it was all due to the aging
Victorian infrastructure. It doesn't seem reasonable to blame Metronet/
Tubelines for the **** that they inherited, even if they should have
known what they were letting themselves in for.


Scientifically speaking, when you're talking about complex
electromechanical systems like train signalling, 30 years and 50 years
is Pretty Damn Old.


I notice that you didn't mention the less than 10 year old Jubilee
Line extension. I accept that the Victoria Line signalling is probably
knackered I just wish that all concerned would stop going on how the
probelms are all due to the "Victorian" infrastructure. The DLR is
hardly Victorian and the signalling and all the trains have been
replaced since it was built.
I can't wait for the first signal failure on the new Westinghouse
system on the Victoria Line and on the new Thales system on the
Jubilee Line.


Kevin


But lots of the newer kit is bolted on to or "talks to" the Victorian
or kit from the 20's-60's!

There will be problems with the new stuff, as it won't be built to
last....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Not on the Jubilee Line and that still gets problems.

Kevin