Mike Bristow wrote:
In article ,
Ernst S Blofeld wrote:
The classic is the "... line has been part suspended due to a *customer*
under a train ...". It is good to see the customer relationship being
valued even in such trying circumstances.

At the point they're under the train, they're not going to go very far
on LuL services, so calling them a passenger is a bit much. And while I
might prefer "selfish idiot", it seems a bit unfair to label folk
thus when most of them are ill, and the remainder careless.

You've missed the point. Calling them a *passenger* is equally as
ridiculous. It is the fact there is a *person* under a train that is the
problem - their status or relationship with TfL is irrelevant to the
disruption.

ESB