Evening all,

Was just reading some old stuff about the channel tunnel project, and came
across a report on a discussion of "Transportation aspects of the Channel
Tunnel and its London Terminal", which i think dates from the early 70s:

http://www.atypon-link.com/doi/pdf/1...icep.1974.4132

No idea if that's accessible to people without blessed IP addresses, but
on page 109, there's some discussion of the site of the London passenger
terminal, for which a new station in White City was the front runner; the
use of Victoria is discussed and rejected, and another site is mentioned,
only to be dismissed with the phrase i quote in the subject line. Guess
where? Give you a clue - starts with a W and ends in "aterloo" ...

Made me laugh, anyway!

What they would have thought of tunnelling right in to King's Cross, i
really don't know.

This White City station is interesting, though. The planned CTRL would
come in to London at South Croydon, along an existing alignment, then run
in tunnel to Balham, surface and carry on on new tracks to Clapham
Junction (didn't realise there was space for another pair here), then join
the WLL and wind up at this place in White City. I don't know where the
station itself would have been; the document says the land is in railway
ownership, but from the relation to the roads, it simplies it would have
been on the site now occupied by the BBC. It also says it's close to Old
Oak Common and Willesden Junction, and two underground lines.

tom

--
YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO ARRIVE MAKE ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS. --
Robin May