Michael Hoffman wrote:

They claim that they never meant to bring the injunction against
millions of people, only four. Well, that's what BAA is claiming anyway.

Here's another story from The Independent
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article2826195.ece:

"""
Amid scenes of near farce at the Royal Courts of Justice, Justice
Caroline Swift, asked Timothy Lawson-Cruttenden, the lawyer representing
BAA's subsidiary, Heathrow Airport Limited, to clarify the terms of the
injunction he was seeking, stating: "I have to know what I am being
asked to do."...

Justice Swift said she was "frankly puzzled" and demanded a clear
explanation of BAA's intentions when the hearing continues today.
"""
--
Michael Hoffman