View Single Post
  #42   Report Post  
Old August 18th 07, 08:59 AM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london,uk.transport.air
NM NM is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 42
Default "Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow is
usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that live
there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an area
with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or
lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient
track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline
railway was initially proposed by Bristolians to move
their goods to London and the railway doesn't follow
the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike" indicates
that the two are close to each other for most or all of
the distance, they're not. Except for a couple of
locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a silly
answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and now
you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a flying
**** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The fact
that you have got you knickers in a twist and are wriggling
around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on


Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on