View Single Post
  #43   Report Post  
Old August 18th 07, 10:03 AM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london,uk.transport.air
Brimstone Brimstone is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default "Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow
is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that
live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more
or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an
ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for a
couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on


Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on


Wriggly wriggly.