View Single Post
  #52   Report Post  
Old August 22nd 07, 09:41 AM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london,uk.transport.air
Doug Doug is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 25
Default "Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.

On 18 Aug, 14:32, NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
news:N61xi.9938$mZ5.137 ...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
news:1187283150.19657 ...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?


Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.


tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?


Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming


Wriggle wriggle


You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

I had a shock the other day at my local Tesco, it seemed to be full of
screaming, underfeet kids! Obviously I picked the wrong day during
schoolsout. I wonder if they were all buying imported food? Talking of
food, I hear that the Chinese have rejected a shipment of US soya, in
retaliation no doubt.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
One man's democracy is another man's regime.