In message .com,
Boltar writes
On Nov 12, 12:49 am, wrote:
a) I didn't think it *was* in a roundel shape.

b) and 50s/60s LT Magazine back issues show it wasn't roundel-shaped
in the 50s or 60s.

Sad that the whole LT uniform iconography has been destroyed and
particpants are reduced to wearing obsolete hats and badges...

Not to mention a complete waste of time and money. What exactly is the
difference between TfL and LT apart from the name? Nothing. Just
another pointless rebranding exercise that threw away 70 odd years of
history.
Yes, I also feel that it was a triumph of design over substance and that
the term "London Transport" could have been used for the new "TfL".
The term after all had survived several other "reinventions" from LPTB
to LT to LTE to LRT and back to LT!
--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk