On 12 Dec, 12:47, Paul Terry wrote:
In message
, Mr
Thant writes

A quick search of Google News says this is the original source, and
doesn't contain this error:
http://www.propertyweek.com/story.as...torycode=31019...

Interesting to see in that report that the development has to make
provision for Crossrail 2.


It's always a good idea to make passive provision for such things. The
notion of Crossrail 2 being built might currently seem laughable, but
in 10, 20 or 30 years time things might be different.