On 14 Dec, 12:58, "Peter Masson" wrote:

"solar penguin" wrote

Maybe they're trying to avoid a Stratford-style mess of random
platform numbers. When the Kent services start, it would be nice if
_all_ the High Level platforms could be numbered from 1 to [whatever],
in order.

AIUI they will be. 1-4 for EMML; 5-10 for E*; 11-13 for Kent.

There were some here who advocated renumbering for the whole KXStP complex
in a single sequence.

Thanks. So since the SPILL platforms are west of 1-4 they should
logically be -1 and 0. I can see why the planners preferred A and B
instead...