View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
Old December 16th 07, 01:02 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
John Rowland John Rowland is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default The Ermine strikes back - The Crossrail Saga

Paul Scott wrote:
"Chris" wrote in message
...

24 Crossrail trains an hour leaves little or no room for extra trains
to fit in on the same tracks as Crossrail, so there's little room for
any other way of running slow (non-Crossrail) to Reading - even if
you remove, say, half of those (12) that would probably terminate at
Heathrow. I doubt it would be as many as 12 trains to Heathrow though
- I can't see the customer levels for heathrow needing a train every
5 minutes (12 an hour). So maybe 6 Heathrows and 18 to Maidenhead
would be a better assumption? Still no real room to insert slow
Readings in between the CRossrails after Hayes though.


Your proposals haven't accounted for about half the crossrail trains
not going any further than the turnback sidings at the 'ghost
station' at Westbourne Park?


They won't actually do that - it's another accounting fiction, like "We're
not going to Reading".