View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 30th 07, 04:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Mwmbwls Mwmbwls is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 125
Default Zonal Boundaries

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...nts/article.do

quote
Call for review of rail zones after complaints
Joe Murphy, Political Editor
28.12.07
A review of London's train fare zones is being called for after a
deluge of protests by passengers.
There has been a rise in complaints from commuters who believe they
are paying too much following the Government's decision to introduce
zonal pricing for rail journeys.
Zonal pricing for single and day return fares was introduced at the
start of this year, increasing the price of some tickets by up to 35
per cent.
Campaigners fear the cost of an annual or monthly pass will rise by
the same rate when zonal pricing for season tickets is introduced in
2010.
The current zones were drawn up in 1983 but their shape dates back
much further.
Zone 1, the inner zone, is based on the Circle line, which was built
in the 19th century, and zone 5 follows the outer edge of the old
Greater London Council boundary.
Falling on the wrong side of a zone boundary could increase the price
of a season ticket by up to £400 a year but in some places the zones
are much closer together than others.
Among the anomalies is Surbiton station, used by five million
passengers a year, which is in zone 6 despite being only 12 miles from
Waterloo. At least 28 stations in the cheaper zone 5 are actually
farther from central London.
Edgware passengers have fought to be moved from zone 5 into zone 4
because they are so close to London.
Epsom, Hinchley Wood, Claygate, Esher, Ashford, Potters Bar, Cuffley,
Theobalds Grove, Cheshunt and Waltham Cross stations are all in areas
that the consumer group London Travelwatch believes should be in zone
6.
In the new year, Hampstead Heath and Willesden Junction will be
redesignated from zone 3 to zone 2 following complaints.
LSE transport economist Tim Leunig, who studied the zoning, believes a
review is overdue. "The rings were squeezed to fit into the same shape
as the old GLC boundary," he said.
"They are close together in some places, which means fares rise
quicker, but elsewhere they are far apart and passengers can travel
longer for the same price."
A review is being promised by Liberal Democrat mayoral candidate Brian
Paddick, who said one of his first acts if elected would be to redraw
zone boundaries to make fares match distance travelled more closely.
He said: "The entire rail ticketing system needs reviewing. Many
commuters are paying over the odds."
Ed Davey, Liberal Democrat MP, for Kingston and Surbiton, said
passengers in his constituency faced a £400 hike in the cost of a
season ticket. "The zones are arbitrary and outdated and my
constituents are losing out very badly as a result," he said. "A
thorough review of the zonal map is long overdue and a very sensible
idea."
A Transport for London spokesman said: "Our zonal boundaries are set
up to provide a simple and fair framework for setting distancebased
ticket prices.
"We will always consider reasonable proposals from residents and the
zoning of stations has been adjusted where appropriate."
Unquote


Any more suggestions as to where the zonal boundaries should be?