On Jan 24, 10:21*am, Old Central wrote:
Thanks for you responses on air rights but Mwmbwls is getting me
confused!

I attended a meeting last year where the subject of air rights in
London was raised and it was considered too costly - Fennell Report,
possession requirements, etc.

Are we talking about air rights for developments adjacent to or over
the railway?

Based on the Victoria and Charing Cross precedents, I was thinking
about both but please elaborate about the points raised at the meeting
you attended. I would have thought Fennelll Report constraints could
be built accomodated in intelligent design.

regards
Mwmbwls