View Single Post
  #52   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 08, 06:00 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling, uk.transport.london, uk.rec.driving
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default Bus Lanes: Proof Of What We All Knew

On Feb 3, 6:32*pm, "Brimstone" wrote:
MIG wrote:
On Feb 3, 5:51 pm, "Brimstone" wrote:
John Rowland wrote:
MIG wrote:


Hailing taxis and having them dart over to the kerb is dangerous
and illegal in any case, regardless of any bus lanes.


It's not dangerous if the driver doesn't do it dangerously. As for
it being illegal ... what *are* you talking about? Are you thinking
of minicabs?


I'd query "thinking".


The current rules seem to go back to 1999, I don't know how they
changed, if they did.


On one hand it seems to be fine to hail a taxi if it isn't dangerous
or causing a nuisance (which it usually is), but on the other hand
drivers can't ply their trade away from a rank. *Seems to depend on
whether they are moving.


Which rules are you quoting?-


This is why I say "seems" and hope from a contribution who knows more
detail. The relevant Acts would seem to have been updated in 1999 for
the GLA, but there's a lot to wade through to find anything relevant,
for example, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/Revise..._18500007_en_1
which seems to be all about the setting up of ranks, and there's loads
of other bits and pieces.

My general understanding of where taxis can ply trade may apparently
not apply to moving taxis, from what it says on TfL. The Cambridge
report refers to danger and nuisance, but TfL doesn't.

It's confusing, given that it's difficult for a taxi to be able to
claim not to be plying for trade when it comes to refusing someone.