"Clive D. W. Feather" wrote in message ...
In article , "I@n"
-uk writes
I don't care what anyone says, doctors note or not, there is no way
someone can be well enough to play squash but be unable to push a few
buttons on a train, or perform lesser duties for a while if necessary.

Irrespective of the facts of the original case, that statement is
rubbish.

Four examples off the top of my head:

(1) The person is short of stamina and can only stay active for an hour
or two. Fine for playing squash but not for driving trains.

Oh bull****. Squash is one of the most active activities you can
participate in. Anyone who can play squash for "an hour or two" can
most certainly stay awake sitting on their arse pushing a lever.

(2) The person has an injury in an area which doesn't affect them
playing squash but does affect train driving (e.g. left wrist of a
right-handed person, or a hip problem preventing them sitting in one
position for long periods.

If he had a bad ankle he wouldn't be able to run around on a squash court.

(3) The injured area is reliable enough for unimportant tasks but not
for critical ones. Exercising an injured ankle through playing squash
might be recommended; if it starts to hurt, the person can stop playing,
whereas if it plays up while driving a train, they can't just stop.

Why exactly can't he drive a train even if he had a bad ankle? Last time
I looked tube trains didn't have floor pedals to operate.

(4) The person has an intermittent eyesight problem that doesn't stop
them playing a game but isn't safe for something like train driving. For
example, temporary blindness in one part of the retina, or temporary
blindness in low light.

Yeah , and if they catch anthrax it might effect their driving too. Meanwhile
back in the real world he was playing squash with a bad ankle. He was taking
the **** and LU were right to fire him.

B2003