Thread
:
East Putney station
View Single Post
#
33
March 23rd 08, 04:00 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Colin Rosenstiel
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,146
East Putney station
In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote:
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article ,
() wrote:
"Richard J." wrote in message
m...
The answer is that the line is fitted with TPWS as well as the
LUL trainstop system. At each signal, there is a TPWS loop and a
trainstop.
I thought there might be something like that. I'm also guessing
that it would be illegal to have tracks not equipped with some sort
of redundant saftey system in potential revenue service.
I thought TPWS was installed on a risk-of-SPADs basis, so not on all
stretches of all passengers lines?
That is correct, in fact a number of TPWS installations are being
removed as some overkill occured during the original fitting.
Does that mean that AWS is then counted as the redundant safety system?
Or is even that not necessary? After all, not all lines have AWS.
--
Colin Rosenstiel
Reply With Quote
Colin Rosenstiel
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Colin Rosenstiel