On Mar 30, 8:50*pm, Boltar wrote:
On 30 Mar, 20:35, "Sargeant Rutter" wrote:

"Boltar" wrote in message

...

On 30 Mar, 14:14, MIG wrote:
I bet that decent pay and working hours of staff correlate pretty well
with the safey of systems anyway.

Well given the rather generous pay scales at LUL it must be pretty
damn safe, so what are they whinging about?

B2003

I,m not sure what you mean? Do you mean that because the wages on London
Underground are good, the employers wont cut costs??

Doesn't anyone on here read a thread in full? I was replying to the
guy who tried to correlate wages with safety.

B2003

Which was meant to imply that striking for one need not be a cover for
the other, since safety of passengers (and staff) and good pay and
conditions for staff are likely to correlate well.