"Ernst Lippe" writes:
Even though some criminal organizations have a large resources at
their disposal, I don't think that they will use them to attack
smart cards. It is just a simple matter of economics. The initial
investments are pretty big, you need some highly skilled experts and
some pretty expensive equipment just to break a single smart
card. In almost all smart card systems you don't gain much when you
are only able to duplicate a single smart card, because it will be
put on the red list and you won't be able to really use any of the
duplicates. But even when you are able to make new "cards"
(actually, these new devices probably are not smart cards (it is not
at all easy to obtain a large set of "empty" smart cards), but other
microprocessor devices that pretend that they are smart cards) you
still have to make major investments, like producing these new
"cards" and more importantly you will have to set up an expensive
distribution channel. Given the large financial risks in such an
operation, I don't think that is economically very attractive, even
for smart cards that have high financial values.

check out "yes card" references in the following post/trip report
(last paragraph):
http://www.smartcard.co.uk/resources...artes2002.html
The "yes card" label is supposedly started in the UK press(?)

also mentioned/reference in thread on WYTM (whats your threat model)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm15.htm#25 WYTM?

--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm