View Single Post
  #23   Report Post  
Old July 15th 08, 03:20 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
ANDREW ROBERT BREEN ANDREW ROBERT BREEN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 55
Default Thameslink Rolling Stock

In article ,
Mr Thant wrote:
On 15 Jul, 13:05, "Paul Scott" wrote:
You've summed up the flawed thinking of the DfT quite well there. *Please
refer to the Thameslink Rolling Stock spec for other conflicting
requirements:


Roger Ford guesses a 200 hp diesel generator will need to be included
under one of the carriages in each unit. It's not a terrible idea but
I can't imagine a cost benefit analysis on it is positive - how often
is the track navigable but the traction supply unavailable?


Plus you['ve got to test the thing to make sure it's functional before the
train goes out each day. Is it a critical failure if it doesn't start
(which will do /wonders/ for train avaiablilty)?

Personally, I rather liked UR's suggestion of a Spearfish power pack
for the emergency self-propelling capability, but each use of a power-pack
wouldn't be cheap

--
Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth

"Who dies with the most toys wins" (Gary Barnes)