Thread
:
Thameslink Rolling Stock
View Single Post
#
59
July 18th 08, 03:14 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Colin Rosenstiel
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,146
Thameslink Rolling Stock
In article ,
_dot_uk (Recliner) wrote:
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message
l.co.uk
In article ,
_dot_uk (Recliner) wrote:
But the aluminium trains are heavier and use more power
than their steel predecessors.
The PEP-derivatives (Classes 313-315, 507 and 508) are aluminium
bodied and as light as anything around, though they are quite old
now.
But aren't the latest Electrostars much heavier? Of course,
they're air-conditioned, faster, safer and quieter, but exactly the
same could be said of modern vs old cars. And at least some modern
cars haven't put on weight (eg, the Jaguar XJ which I cited).
Indeed so.
--
Colin Rosenstiel
Reply With Quote
Colin Rosenstiel
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Colin Rosenstiel