Drunk passenger attack leads to strike
On Jul 31, 12:20 am, John B wrote:
On Jul 30, 4:42 pm, wrote:
We're not talking about whether punching LUL staff is good, we're
talking about whether the account of the staff member is reliable.
If the police don't consider a crime has been committed then theres no
reason for LUL to sack him.
Which is utter bull****. If a LUL staff member at your local station
tracked down your details and called you a dickhead every time you
passed through the barrier, he'd be obviously and blatantly guilty of
gross misconduct without having committed a crime.
I was talking about this specific case, not in general. There was
obviously a fight and obviously the staff member defended himself or
plod would have hauled him off.
I'm amused to discover you're *so* right-wing in authoritarian terms
that it outweighs your hatred of the public sector in economic terms
I don't hate the public sector, I hate getting ripped off whether its
a public sector company like LUL or a private sector one like my
electricity company. I can change the latter , can't do much about the
former if I have to travel into central london.
and makes you spout nonsense that's irrational
Well, you'd know all about that.
B2003
|