View Single Post
  #90   Report Post  
Old August 18th 08, 11:46 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london
Richard J.[_2_] Richard J.[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
Default TfL Admits Livingstone Regime Deliberately Obstructed Traffic Flows

JNugent wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

JNugent wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
JNugent wrote:
Brimstone wrote:


Strange, I'd always got the impression that you were in favour of
more people being allowed to travel easily by road between
various points in London? Maybe I've misunderstood.


That does not include allowing pedestrians, cyclists,
horses-and-carts, moped-riders and milk-floats to use motorways.


Which motorway is such traffic allowed to use?


The former A40(M), M41 and A102(M) - or at least, the automatic
motorway restrictions no longer apply.
All achieved by stripping those roads of their motorway status and
handing them over to Mad Ken.


So they're not motorways?


I was wondering whether you would try that line.

They used to be motorways and had the traffic-flow efficiencies of
that category.

Then they were reclassified as non-motorways precisely so that Mad Ken
could get his grubby mitts on them


Actually it was in order to have a sensible division of responsibilities
between Transport for London and the DfT/Highways Agency. It wouldn't have
made much sense, for example, to have the DfT responsible for a few miles of
isolated motorway in West London on routes which were otherwise being
transferred to TfL. Still, I guess it's more satisfying for you to make
cheap jokes about the previous Mayor.

and downgrade the speed limits,


.... in the case of ex-A40(M) to the design speed of the road, and improving
the traffic-flow efficiency at peak times too, so what's your problem with
that?

narrow them,


Ex-A40(M) is still 6 lanes; don't know about A102(M); M41 reduced from 6 to
4 in order, I think, to incorporate the junction for the Westfield Centre
(White City), but this hasn't affected traffic-flow efficiency as the
roundabouts at each end are the limiting factor.

or anything else of the sort of thing you'd expexct from
him (he never had authority over any of the London motorways - eg, M1,
M3(?), M4, M40, M11 - except the ones which were nobbled and handed
over to him.


See above for the reason. No part of M3 or M40 is within Greater London, by
the way.
--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)