View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old September 24th 08, 10:02 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Chris Tolley Chris  Tolley is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 86
Default 378 move and GOB to be DC?

Mizter T wrote:

On 24 Sep, 10:16, Chris Tolley wrote:

Neil Williams wrote:
Dunno, but there is no excuse for 2-car DMUs to be being used on this
kind of service.


Look at Merseyrail for how it should be done (and without any new
MUs)


Eh?

On the electric lines, new MUs were introduced as the loop line was
being developed. They certainly aren't *still* new, but they were new
for the current routes.


And by all accounts they're less than ideal for the city centre loop
as well.


AIUI, the curvature on the track gives rise to increased wear on the
wheels. If so, that's more a track problem than a train problem.

I suppose there are compounding features as well, given that the
Merseyrail loop line is an intensive service. F'rinstance, at
Farringdon, there's a fairly tight curve on Thameslink, but a particular
train will pass over it much less frequently.

--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p15036436.html
(33 110 at Basingstoke, Mar 1991)