Thread
:
Public transport - why?
View Single Post
#
27
September 26th 08, 06:14 PM posted to uk.misc,uk.local.scot-highlands,uk.transport.london
Peter Hucker[_2_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Public transport - why?
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:19:15 +0100, Bing Trotsky wrote:
In article ,
says...
Paul Weaver writes:
On 24 Sep, 21:57, "Peter Hucker" wrote:
It's just not viable.
For a laugh (and because they just built a station next to my house) I decided to check the feasability of a train to work. *It takes twice as long and costs twice as much as by car. *(1.5 hours instead of 45 mins and 16.50 instead of 7.50)
Silly treehuggers.
Is this the same throughout the country? *I'm in central Scotland.
Nope. Train for me takes 1h05 - 1h20 depending on when I leave, car
takes 1h25 in good traffic
For me, train takes 20 minutes, door to door; the car 45-60. Cost of
train: about fiver; just parking the car costs rather more than that.
I'm in central Scotland, too.
I'm in central London. A 45 minute journey by car I can probably walk in
15 minutes.
I think the problem is my journey is not in line with the rails. I have to change twice (the train not my clothes).
I have an LPG vehicle which is cheaper, and I drive in a non standard way which is faster.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com
http://www.insanevideoclips.com
http://www.petersphotos.com
System error 4C: kernel panic
Reply With Quote
Peter Hucker[_2_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Peter Hucker[_2_]