View Single Post
  #38   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 08, 05:06 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit
Arthur Figgis Arthur Figgis is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,147
Default Crossrail NOT making connections

MIG wrote:
On Dec 2, 10:51 pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote

No, Crossrail should stop at Slough, and concentrate on being an
affordable and effective suburban railway, and not a pie-in-the-sky all
things to all people scheme.

Crossrail will go to Maidenhead, Heathrow, Shenfield, and Abbey Wood. Any
strong pressure to change any of these destinations is more likely to mean
that Crossrail doesn't happen at all than that changes will be made.
Subsequent add-ons are possible - Reading is the obvious one, so that diesel
trains out of Paddington can be eliminated from the Relief Lines, while the
Main Lines can become a totally 125 mph railway. Gravesend is a long shot,
but may be needed for (and financed by) development in the Thames Gateway..
Another destination west of Paddington would be nice, but no-one has come up
with any convincing case. Richmond - Kingston did not attract universal
support. Amersham - Aylesbury would be nice, so that the Met line can
concentrate on Uxbridge and Watford, while the fast lines beyond
Harrow-on-the-Hill would become single use by Crossrail, and electrified at
25 kV OHLE. But traffic density is insufficient to generate a business case.
More trains can't be pushed down the GWML - there's not teh demand, and
capacity is needed for freight west of Acton Yard. So I think we're stuck
with the Westbourne Park reversing sidings.


The problem to my disordered mind is that Crossrail will have to be
duplicated by local diesel trains all the way to Maidenhead in order
to cover the bit from Maidenhead to Reading (which is a huge hub).
The reason is presumably to save on some miles of electrification, but
it's not a logical place to terminate the services while making a
sensible use of paths.


Budgets. Reading needs remodelling anyway. But if Crossrail goes to
Reading, the cost of remodelling it could get added to the cost of
Crossrail, which is already going to cost squillions.

But if Crossrail doesn't go to Reading, it will need rebuilding anyway.
But this will be from a different budget, and while they are doing the
remodelling they may as well make provision for any future extension of
Crossrail...

--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK