In message , at 10:17:25 on Fri,
5 Dec 2008, Mike Bristow remarked:
However, a landowner can (legally) ban photography on it's land
where a public right of way does not exist.

This would mean that photographers, who were aware of that ban,
become tresspassers when they take a picture.

Interesting when the landowner's reaction is to attempt to stop the
trespasser leaving by the shortest and quickest route! (In this case a
train).

Does the landowner have the power to insist they leave by the
landowner's choice of route, when that is further and slower?
--
Roland Perry