Waterloo gateline
On Dec 13, 10:58*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 13 Dec, 22:02, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, MIG wrote:
On Dec 13, 4:47*pm, Mizter T wrote:
Many (inc. Paul C) have said that better information should be provided
- I suspect the basic problem with providing this information is that
it might assist people in working out the potential loopholes that are
inherent with interchange validators, something I've hinted at in the
past though I note one contributor to this ng recently laid it out in a
straightforward manner. In other words spelling out exactly how they
work will assist people to abuse the system.
Much as I admire your knowledgeable and good-tempered contributions,
that has got to be the most ridiculous thing I've ever read.
Keeping the rules a secret in order to increase compliance with the
rules?
Mizter T is a former home secretary, AICMFP.
tom
You'll end up in Guantanamo for reason redacted if you're not
careful sonny!
I think that's what they call an unresolved journey ...
|